<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://articlefeeds.nasdaq.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel xmlns:nasdaq="http://nasdaq.com/reference/feeds/1.0/">
    <title>Latest Articles about MCOX</title>
    <description />
    <language>EN-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:32:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://articlefeeds.nasdaq.com/nasdaq/symbols?symbol=MCOX" /><feedburner:info uri="nasdaq/symbols" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item xml:base="http://www.nasdaq.com/article/which-of-these-dead-chinese-ipos-will-rebound-cm49186">
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49186</guid>
      <link>http://articlefeeds.nasdaq.com/~r/nasdaq/symbols/~3/eJl3q4PHbOQ/which-of-these-dead-chinese-ipos-will-rebound-cm49186</link>
      <category>Investing</category>
      <category>Commodities</category>
      <category>International</category>
      <category>Investing Ideas</category>
      <title>Which of These 'Dead' Chinese IPOs Will Rebound?</title>
      <description>One of the curious aspects of the recent rebound in the   IPO   market is the heavy slate of China-based companies in the mix. It remains pretty hard for U.S.-based companies to line up a deal,&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nasdaq/symbols/~4/eJl3q4PHbOQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:00:00 Z</pubDate>
      <a10:updated>2010-12-15T06:04:10Z</a10:updated>
      <author>David Sterman</author>
      <nasdaq:tickers>BITA</nasdaq:tickers>
      <nasdaq:tickers>CTE</nasdaq:tickers>
      <nasdaq:tickers>EPS</nasdaq:tickers>
      <nasdaq:tickers>GM</nasdaq:tickers>
      <nasdaq:tickers>MCOX</nasdaq:tickers>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.nasdaq.com/article/which-of-these-dead-chinese-ipos-will-rebound-cm49186</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item xml:base="http://www.nasdaq.com/article/when-options-arent-the-best-option-cm47486">
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47486</guid>
      <link>http://articlefeeds.nasdaq.com/~r/nasdaq/symbols/~3/kyD3XMrvqtk/when-options-arent-the-best-option-cm47486</link>
      <category>Investing</category>
      <category>Options</category>
      <title>When options aren't the best option</title>
      <description>Sometimes options aren't the best option. This week's activity in Mecox Lane is one such instance.        The Chinese retailer fell a stunning 39 percent Monday to close at $8.15. At one point&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nasdaq/symbols/~4/kyD3XMrvqtk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:18:17 Z</pubDate>
      <a10:updated>2010-12-02T15:48:08Z</a10:updated>
      <author>David Russell</author>
      <nasdaq:tickers>MCOX</nasdaq:tickers>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.nasdaq.com/article/when-options-arent-the-best-option-cm47486</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
